Commercial and Corporations

The Commercial and Corporations National Practice Area (NPA) covers:

• commercial contract disputes
• disputes concerning the conduct of corporations and their officers
• financial and transactional disputes
• insurance disputes
• all insolvency matters, both corporate and personal
• commercial class actions
• consumer claims (including Regulator claims)
• competition matters (including Economic Regulator-related matters)
• commercial arbitration disputes.

NPA Sub-areas

This NPA consists of six Sub-areas and each has a dedicated group of judges with expertise in that Sub-area:

• Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance Sub-area includes commercial contracts and matters relating to insurance, banking, finance and commercial transactional disputes
• Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Sub-area includes Corporations List matters, such as:
  • the appointment or conduct of liquidators
  • corporate insolvency matters, such as voidable transactions, extending of convening periods and cross-border insolvency
  • schemes of arrangement
  • shareholder oppression actions
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission actions, such as the approval of director appointments, winding up of companies, fundraising matters, corporate management and misconduct by company officers
  • corporations matters referred to a Judge by a Judicial Registrar.
• General and Personal Insolvency Sub-area includes bankruptcy matters referred to a Judge by a Judicial Registrar and personal insolvency matters, including:
  • applications by trustees in the management of bankrupt estates
  • applications by bankrupts contesting decisions of a trustee
  • applications for annulment of bankruptcy.
• Regulator and Consumer Protection Sub-area includes:
  • consumer-related matters such as misleading and deceptive conduct, unconscionable conduct, unfair commercial practices, product liability matters and false advertising
  • Australian Consumer Law actions by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
• Economic Regulator, Competition and Access Sub-area includes:
  • matters concerning anti-competitive conduct, including cartel matters (civil), mergers, misuse of market power and exclusive dealing
  • competition actions by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
  • infrastructure access and regulatory pricing.
• Commercial Arbitration Sub-area which covers matters concerning international contractual disputes under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) including:
  • scope of jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal
  • stay applications and setting aside arbitral awards
  • enforcement of a foreign award or arbitral award
  • appointment or termination of appointment of an arbitrator
  • enforcement issues pursuant to the UNCITRAL Model Law.

This is a general guide to the types of matters in each Sub-area and is not intended to be exhaustive.

The Court is of the view that case management should reflect a practical business-like method of resolving a problem that eliminates unnecessary process-driven costs. It expects, particularly in commercial matters, that parties and their lawyers approach the litigation in a thoughtful, practical and common-sense way.

To facilitate this, the Court is encouraging:

• new mechanisms, such as the “concise statement method”, to expedite the commencement of commercial disputes
• tailored case management, to ensure the matter is managed in the manner best suited to its character and needs
• targeted document production and evidence procedures, such as “the Redfern Discovery Procedure” and the “Memorial Procedure”

Expediting a commercial dispute – Concise Statement Method

Under the NCF reforms and new practice documents, you may now seek to expedite your hearing process by any of the expedited processes available, including by way of the new “concise statement method”.

The Court anticipates that the majority of Commercial and Corporations matters will be assisted by being commenced with a concise statement. For details about the concise statement method see the National Court Framework webpage and the Central Practice Note (CPN-1) and Commercial and Corporations Practice Note (C&C-1).

Fast Track

The former Fast Track mechanisms permitted parties to seek a quicker or more truncated hearing process than usually available and to use less formal pleadings. The Fast Track procedure was effectively a commercial list procedure and such a procedure, or other effective and commercially sensible methods of commencing or expediting proceedings or introducing informal pleadings processes, remains open to the parties in this NPA. The procedure for the Fast Track mechanisms are set out in the former Practice Note: CM8 - Fast Track.

If a Fast Track or other expedited proceeding process is appropriate, the Court will attempt to provide a judge who has the necessary time available to devote to an expedited process and hearing.

Case management imperatives - first case management hearing

The first case management hearing is integral to the case management of a commercial matter, with the aim of identifying the issues in the matter at the earliest possible stage.

The Court expects that prior to the first case management hearing parties will consider and discuss with the other parties the “case management imperatives”, which are set out in the Court’s Central Practice Note, with some additional specific imperatives set out in the Commercial and Corporations Practice Note.

The case management imperatives that the Court expects parties to have considered include:

• identifying and narrowing the issues in dispute and making appropriate admissions in relation to the facts and matters which are not seriously in dispute
• considering any alternative dispute resolution, including mediation
• considering if any issues can be dealt with separately – such as preliminary issues of fact and law, or liability and quantum or penalty
• considering if expert evidence is required and if so, how best to put forward evidence – ie. by affidavit, statement, oral evidence or a combination
• discussing how to eliminate or reduce the burden of discovery
• agreeing on the time for trial and how it may be divided.

The Court’s national duty system has dedicated Commercial and Corporations NPA Duty Judges who provide timely and proactive responses to urgent Commercial and Corporation duty matters.

Practitioners can liaise directly with the chambers of the Commercial and Corporations Duty Judge to ensure that genuinely urgent matters are heard as soon as practicable. An urgent matter can be heard at any time, including, for cases that must be heard immediately, outside of business hours.

See the list of the current Commercial and Corporations Duty Judges in each registry (updated daily) and more information on How to Apply.

The NPA practice note sets out the arrangements for the management of Commercial and Corporations proceedings:

Other general practice notes and Court developed guides which may be relevant to this NPA include:

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available on the Forms, Fees & Costs section of the Court’s website or from the Registry.

Commencing a proceeding in this NPA

Specific forms and rules for commencing proceedings in this NPA are available for each of the Sub-areas listed above.

In addition to the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (Rules), in the Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Sub-area and the General and Personal Insolvency Sub-area, the following rules apply respectively:

• Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) (Corporations Rules)
• Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) (Bankruptcy Rules)

Subject to any specific legislative requirements relating to proceedings in any of the NPA Sub-areas, a Commercial and Corporations proceeding will generally be commenced by filing:

Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine steps statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA - see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

• Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
• Australian Securities Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
• Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)

• 10 Jun 2026: Amaero Ltd, in the matter of Amaero Ltd (No 2) [2026] FCA 736
  CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – second court hearing – application for approval of schemes under section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – US Securities Act of 1933 exemption – schemes approved
  Judge: OWENS J
• 12 Jun 2026: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Nararra Developments Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Nararra Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2026] FCA 730
  CORPORATIONS – application by the defendant to replace liquidators and receivers on the basis of a conflict – liquidators are plaintiffs suing the defendant in a related proceedings alleging tax avoidance schemes by which monies owing to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation were distributed to the defendant indirectly through other companies –…
  Judge: MOORE J
• 3 Jun 2026: Brushe v Stanton [2026] FCA 740
  BANKRUPTCY – where parties jointly sought declaration that transfer of money is void against applicant pursuant to ss 120 and 121 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – whether a bare declaration would have utility – declaration made COSTS – where proceeding settled between the parties – where applicant submits he should have his costs on…
  Judge: RANGIAH J
• 11 Jun 2026: Kandos Development Corporation Pty Ltd v Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 743
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether an order should be made for hearing of a separate question – where proposed separate question is complex and would provide minimal advantage if answered in favour of the party seeking it – where proposed separate question would provide no real saving of time, cost or energy – application dismissed
  Judge: JACKMAN J
• 12 Jun 2026: Pheonix A Pty Ltd v Spring UT Pty Ltd ATF Spring Unit Trust [2026] FCA 728
  CONTRACT – agreement for lease of commercial property – where landlord terminated agreement for lease and related lease on the basis that a condition relating to the plans and specifications for the tenant’s works had not been satisfied – where the tenant sued the landlord for damages for breach of contract for wrongful termination of agreement…
  Judge: MOSHINSKY J
• 4 Jun 2026: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Keystone Asset Management Limited (receivers and managers appointed) (in liquidation) (No 5) [2026] FCA 729
  CORPORATIONS – examination proceeding – where liquidators sought a direction under s 597(9) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that an examinee produce certain bank statements – where the examinee contended that the application for the direction was an abuse of process – direction made
  Judge: MOSHINSKY J
• 11 Jun 2026: SCL Aus Limited v Kirkalocka Gold SPV Pty Ltd, In the matter of Kirkalocka Gold SPV Pty Ltd (Costs) [2026] FCAFC 84
  COSTS - where appeal brought on two grounds - where first ground was unsuccessful - where second ground upheld on a basis that resulted in appeal being allowed - where declaration granted on appeal was in terms that upheld the substantive claim by the respondent - where each of the appellant and the respondent sought an order for costs in its…
  Judge: COLVIN, NESKOVCIN AND VANDONGEN JJ
• 11 Jun 2026: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (No 5) [2026] FCA 719
  CORPORATIONS – proceedings by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) against defendants operating financial services businesses involving contracts for difference and margin foreign exchange contracts – where defendants provided personal advice in contravention of s 911A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where defendants …
  Judge: WIGNEY J
• 11 Jun 2026: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ALAMMC Developments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2026] FCA 725
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — where Receivers appointed to the property of the 14th and 15th defendants — where other defendants are in Receivership — where Court directed payment into Court from the proceeds of the Receiverships — where 14th and 15th defendants charged with contempt — application pursuant to s 20(5)(aa) of the Federal Court of…
  Judge: O'SULLIVAN J
• 11 Jun 2026: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v RSA Express Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 722
  CONSUMER LAW – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Application by regulator for declaration of contravention of sections 18, 29 and 34 of the Australian Consumer Law – where respondent provided online courses for Responsible Service of Alcohol and White Card certification – where respondent represented to consumers that payment would only be…
  Judge: DERRINGTON J

• 21 Feb 2026: Breach of fiduciary duty - the good, the bad and the ugly
  Paper delivered to the SA Bar Association Conference
  
• 4 Sep 2025: Some reflections on the use of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology in insurance litigation
  Speech presented at the Australian Professional Indemnity Group National Conference
  
• 28 Mar 2025: Superannuation trustees’ duty to make money for their beneficiaries
  Paper delivered to the Law Council of Australia Superannuation Lawyers' Conference
  
• 30 Jul 2024: Observations on construing a commercial contract as a whole
  Paper presented to the Western Australian Bar Association and Francis Burt Chambers Civil Litigation Skills Course.
  
• 21 Jun 2024: Is cryptocurrency property?
  Paper delivered to the Commercial Law Association of Australia
  

• Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
• Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
• Australian Financial Security Authority (AFSA)