Other Federal Jurisdiction

About this NPA


The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or referrals from the High Court of Australia, in its capacity as the Court of Disputed Returns, pursuant to s 329 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments


  • 15 Oct 2026: Banjima Native Title Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC v State of Western Australia [2026] FCA 1578
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for amendments to the statement of claim that would advance the claims in the proceedings by the native title Aboriginal Corporation as trustee for the native title holders instead of representative applicant and for the proceedings to no longer continue as representative proceedings under Part IVA of the…
    Judge: COLVIN J
  • 14 Oct 2026: Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (a firm) (Extension of Time) [2026] FCA 1513
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for extension of time within which to review two costs decisions of a Registrar – where one application 15 months out of time and the other one month out of time – where Registrar declined to award a nominal sum and determined to award an ‘other sum’ pursuant to r 40.15(1)(b) of the Federal Court…
    Judge: DOWLING J
  • 8 Oct 2026: Knight v Corrections Victoria (ex parte leave to institute proceeding) [2026] FCA 1484
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether leave should be granted under Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.27A to permit an unrepresented litigant to file an originating application to bring representative proceedings and supporting affidavit – where unrepresented litigant cannot represent another person without leave, and leave is almost invariably…
    Judge: HILL J
  • 21 Sep 2026: Finnegan v Kemner (No 3) [2026] FCA 1402
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend reply – rr 16.53 and 26.11 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – proposed amended reply seeks to withdraw admission – grant of leave is in the interests of administration of justice – prejudice to the respondent is minimal – leave granted
    Judge: JACKSON J
  • 4 Sep 2026: Thurston v Fox Sports Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2026] FCAFC 118
    COSTS – whether accidental slip or omission in order by Full Court concerning costs below upon remittal.
    Judge: BROMWICH, O'CALLAGHAN AND ABRAHAM JJ

Practice Notes


Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees


Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:

Forms:
Rules:

Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.

Resources


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:

Subscribe


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions

National Coordinating Judges

  • Wigney J
  • Wheelahan J

National Coordinating Registrar

  • Paul Farrell

NPA Judges

Was this page useful?

What did you like about it?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

How can we make it better?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

* This online submission is protected by captcha