Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA logo with link NPA logo with link

About this NPA

The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or cases involving the Court acting as a Court of disputed returns. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments

  • 19 Mar 2020: Hayson v The Age Company Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 361
    DEFAMATION - Whether defamatory imputations alleged were conveyed - where same allegations were published earlier in separate articles that were not sued upon - whether aggravated damages warranted - held: the two admitted imputations were conveyed and the three disputed imputations were not - though damages could not be mitigated on the basis of…
    Judge: Bromwich J
  • 18 Mar 2020: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Chau [2020] FCAFC 48
    DEFAMATION -- appeal from orders of the primary judge that verdict and judgment be entered in favour of the respondent against the appellants in the amount of $280,000 -- where the primary judge found that the matter complained of carried three of four imputations alleged by the respondent -- where the appellants raised the defence of qualified…
    Judge: Besanko, Bromwich and Wheelahan JJ
  • 12 Feb 2020: Kabbabe v Google LLC [2020] FCA 126
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to serve originating application seeking preliminary discovery outside Australia pursuant to Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 10.41 to 10.43 - whether the proceeding is of a kind mentioned in r 10.42 - whether the prospective applicant has a prima facie case for all or any of the relief claimed - service in…
    Judge: Murphy J
  • 7 Feb 2020: Prasad v Google LLC [2020] FCA 67
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for preliminary discovery - application for an order to transfer the proceeding to the Supreme Court of Victoria under s 5(4) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) - whether application a "proceeding" - power to transfer where no full examination of the Court's jurisdiction with respect…
    Judge: Wheelahan J
  • 31 Jan 2020: Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm (No 5) [2020] FCA 34
    DEFAMATION - appropriate interest rate on the sum awarded for non-economic loss - whether the Applicant should be granted permanent injunctive relief - assessment of the existence and degree of the risk of repetition of the publication of the defamatory matters - whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis pursuant to s 40(2) of the…
    Judge: White J

Practice Notes

Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees

Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:


Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions