Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA logo with link NPA logo with link

About this NPA

The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or cases involving the Court acting as a Court of disputed returns. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments

  • 6 Jan 2020: Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 2
    EVIDENCE - three interlocutory applications filed in three defamation proceedings - where the respondents claim journalist privilege under s 126K of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) in relation to various documents recording conversations with confidential sources and/or various documents provided by confidential sources - where the applicant seeks an…
    Judge: Besanko J
  • 23 Dec 2019: Mununggurr v Seven West Media Limited [2019] FCA 2188
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application by litigation representative to approve terms of settlement under rr 9.70 and 9.71 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 - where applicants under legal incapacity because of age - where settlement was in best interests of applicants - settlement approved with moneys to be held on trust for applicants by the Public…
    Judge: Rares J
  • 18 Dec 2019: Noicos v Dawson [2019] FCA 2197
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for freezing orders against Respondents pursuant to r 7.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - Respondents alleged to have contravened s 12DA of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - Third Respondent opposed application on a number of bases including that he had not engaged…
    Judge: White J
  • 25 Nov 2019: Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm (No 4) [2019] FCA 1981
    DEFAMATION - multiple publications - whether the imputations concerning the Applicant which the Respondent admitted had been conveyed were defamatory of her - whether an imputation which is otherwise defamatory may not be defamatory when published by one politician concerning another politician - whether defamatory imputations were rendered…
    Judge: White J
  • 20 Nov 2019: Kitchen v Director of Professional Services Review Under s 83 of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) [2019] FCA 1978
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - investigation of whether medical practitioner engaged in inappropriate practice - urgent application for interim injunction to restrain hearing - allegation that applicant would be denied natural justice - application dismissed
    Judge: Rangiah J

Practice Notes

Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees

Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:


Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions