Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA logo with link NPA logo with link

About this NPA


The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or referrals from the High Court of Australia, in its capacity as the Court of Disputed Returns, pursuant to s 329 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments


  • 24 Jul 2024: El-Hanania v Cull [2024] FCA 814
    BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - where applicant (an undischarged bankrupt) seeks trustees' consent to travel overseas - where trustees refused consent - whether Court should direct trustees to give consent
    Judge: Katzmann J
  • 5 Jul 2024: Commonwealth of Australia v Palmanova Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 90
    CULTURAL HERITAGE - where "protected object of a foreign country" (the Artefact) purchased by the respondent was, upon its entry into Australia, intercepted under the Customs Act 1901 (Cth) and seized under the Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986 (Cth) (the Act) - whether the Artefact is liable to forfeiture under s 14(1) of the Act…
    Judge: Banks-smith, Abraham and Downes JJ
  • 27 Jun 2024: Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Costs) (No 2) [2024] FCA 706
    COSTS - where applicant previously ordered to pay costs on an ordinary and indemnity basis - where quantification of costs to be referred to a referee for inquiry and report - facilitation of the overarching purpose - where calculation of lump sum costs appropriate - quantification of lump sum costs - broadbrush approach - costs order in the…
    Judge: Lee J
  • 26 Jun 2024: Electoral Commissioner v McQuestin [2024] FCA 685
    COSTS - application to vary order that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceeding - whether the respondent should be regarded as the successful party in the litigation - whether the applicant's refusal of a settlement offer was unreasonable - application refused
    Judge: O'Bryan J
  • 20 Jun 2024: Edwards v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (No 6) [2024] FCA 758
    COSTS - Application for indemnity costs by successful applicant in defamation proceeding - where applicant made valid offer of compromise - where terms of the judgment were more favourable than the offer - whether rejection of applicant's offer unreasonable - whether Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 40 'picked up' in federal jurisdiction - whether…
    Judge: Wigney J

Practice Notes


Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees


Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:

Forms:
Rules:

Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.

Resources


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:

Subscribe


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions