Latest Judgments

Judgments are generally published within 24 hours of being made available by Judges' staff, often earlier. In cases of high media interest, we endeavour to publish judgments within 1 hour of being delivered by the Court.

If you cannot find a judgment, check Federal Law Search; it will  tell you the status of the matter before the Court, including whether a judgment has been delivered.



Today's published judgments

Administrative Law
National Disability Insurance Agency v Warwick [2025] FCAFC 100
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - proper construction of r 5.1(d) of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (Supports for Participants) Rules 2013 (Cth) - meaning of the phrase 'day-to-day living costs (for example, rent, groceries and utility fees) that are not attributable to a participant's disability support needs' - costs of Scheme participant moving home - no error in decision of primary judge APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - appellate jurisdiction of the Court - appeal by way of rehearing - contention that orders below did not take account of subsequent legislative amendments - amendments not retrospective - error needed to engage appellate jurisdiction of the Court - error not asserted by the appellant nor established - appeal dismissed
4 Aug 2025 |  COLVIN, JACKSON AND STELLIOS JJ


Corporations Law
Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd v Patial [2025] FCA 884
CORPORATIONS – application to set aside creditors statutory demands served on four companies – whether the companies applied “to the Court for an order setting aside a statutory demand” within the meaning of s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in circumstances where, as co-plaintiffs, they filed one originating application to set aside the demands – whether individual proceedings are required – held individual proceedings not required CORPORATIONS – application to set aside creditors statutory demands served on four companies – whether service of the originating application and affidavit in support was effected for the purposes of s 459G and whether personal service was required – held service was effected and personal service not required – unmeritorious position taken as to service despite receipt of documents having been acknowledged by recipient – application of the “effective informal service rule” – service electronically and in a physical form under s 110C and 110D of the Act CORPORATIONS – creditors statutory demands – whether genuine dispute established – where the legal foundation of the alleged debt not clear – where quantum of the alleged debts has changed several times – where the existence of debts in dispute in another proceeding – genuine dispute established CORPORATIONS – creditors statutory demands – whether the demands should be set aside for another reason – held that the demands should be set aside as an abuse of process COSTS – costs payable on an indemnity basis in circumstances where unmeritorious position taken with respect to service, where the existence of a genuine dispute was obvious and where the demands were not withdrawn, and the winding up proceedings were commenced and continued despite notice of fundamental problems
4 Aug 2025 |  GOODMAN J


Bankruptcy
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Fayad [2025] FCA 888
BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where respondents voluntarily entered bankruptcy by presenting debtor’s petitions while applicant’s creditor’s petitions against them were on foot – where the applicant seeks the costs of the creditor’s petitions be paid from the estate of the respondent debtors “with the same priority as if a sequestration order had been made” in accordance with s 109(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – whether such costs orders are provable in the bankrupt estates – whether if not they are within the power of the Court to make under the Act
1 Aug 2025 |  STEWART J


 

 

 

Was this page useful?

What did you like about it?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

How can we make it better?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

* This online submission is protected by captcha