Browse Federal Court Judgments

Published in the last week

In order of publication date with most recent additions at the top.


Migration
Liao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 412
MIGRATION – application for extension of time to apply for judicial review of decision of the Minister to cancel the applicant's visa under s 501(3)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – delay – merits of proposed grounds – where sentencing judge
BANKS-SMITH J - 30 Apr 2025


Practice and Procedure
The Advanced Technology Group Pty Ltd v Foxtel Cable Television Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 408
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for security for costs – principles applicable where risk of stultification alleged – nature of evidence required – where insufficient evidence of stultification
MOORE J - 29 Apr 2025


Admiralty
Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd v CSL Australia Pty Ltd (The Goliath) [2025] FCAFC 53
ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW – Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 – limitation of liability for wreck – meaning and scope of Arts 2(1)(a) and (d) of the Convention – where vessel MV Goliath owned and operated by the first respondent allided with two berthed tugs owned by the appellant – where tugs sank and became wrecks – where appellant claims against the vessel owners for the costs of the recovery, removal and disposal of the tugs and bunker fuel onboard – whether such claims are excluded from limitation under Art 2(1)(d) of the Convention because Australia has exercised a reservation under Art 18(1) by which Art 2(1)(d) is not given the force of law in Australia
BURLEY, SARAH C DERRINGTON AND - 29 Apr 2025


Practice and Procedure
UIL (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Wollongong Coal Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 417
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where Applicant seeks leave to file and serve proposed further amended statement of claim – where new claims present triable issues – explanation for delay – prejudice – impact on trial date and other matters – whether amendments should be allowed
BENNETT J - 11 Apr 2025


Costs
Ezy-Fit Engineering Group Pty Limited v Microm Nominees Pty Limited (No 4) [2025] FCA 411
COSTS – first applicant had mixed success at trial – second applicant unsuccessful – factors relevant to discount to be applied to costs otherwise payable – disproportion between time and costs of trial and outcome – respondents claim indemnity costs from date of offers – whether judgment less favourable than offers under r 25.14(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether regardless r 25.14(1) should not apply – whether Calderbank principles apply – respondents to pay applicants' costs on standard basis but with significant discount – apportionment of costs between respondents
BANKS-SMITH J - 29 Apr 2025


Corporations Law
Bredenkamp (Liquidator), in the matter of Coolgardie Minerals Limited (in liq) [2025] FCA 404
CORPORATIONS - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 477(2B) - application for retrospective approval for entry into funding agreement lasting more than three months - application for approval for entry into proposed legal costs agreement lasting more than three months - application for suppression orders to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice - approvals granted - orders made
JACKSON J - 17 Apr 2025


Corporations Law
Selfwealth Ltd, in the matter of Selfwealth Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 416
CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – second court hearing – order sought under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) approving scheme
O'BRYAN J - 28 Apr 2025


Industrial Law
Central Goldfields Shire Council v Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union [2025] FCAFC 59
INDUSTRIAL LAW – application for judicial review of a decision of a Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (“Commission”) – where Commission made a single interest employer authorisation (“SIEA”) – whether Commission misunderstood how properly to assess whether or not the making of an SIEA would be contrary to the public interest – whether Commission misunderstood significance to public interest of “fundamental workplace relations principles” established by s 3A of the Fair Work (Commonwealth Powers) Act 2009 (Vic) – application dismissed.
COLLIER, SNADEN AND RAPER JJ - 29 Apr 2025


Migration
GRCF v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 415
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a Minister’s decision made personally under s 501BA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where part of the Minister’s reasoning illogical – whether illogicality was material – where the Minister did not obtain updated information about the Applicant – whether unreasonable to treat dated material as if it were up to date – whether sufficient consideration of legal consequences of decision –
BENNETT J - 29 Apr 2025


Corporations Law
Australian Steel Manufacturing Pty Ltd v Selection Steel Trading Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 407
CORPORATIONS – application for review of Registrar’s decision dismissing application to set aside a statutory demand – review by way of hearing de novo - whether genuine dispute about the existence or amount of the debt and whether there is an offsetting claim within meaning of s 459H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – relevant principles –
O'BRYAN J - 29 Apr 2025


Costs
Mount v Dover Castle Metals Pty Ltd (Costs) [2025] FCA 402
COSTS – where applicant sued respondents for damages/compensation, exemplary damages and pecuniary penalties alleging contraventions of whistleblower provisions of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and of general protections provisions of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and also claimed to have been wrongfully dismissed – where Fair Work Act claims abandoned shortly before trial and other claims dismissed – where applicant refused to accept numerous offers to settle proceedings – where respondents applied for costs and both Acts limit power of Court to make costs orders against an applicant in applicant’s position, which Act applies – where respondents claim applicant’s failure to accept any one of three particular offers of settlement was unreasonable, whether applicant should be ordered to pay costs – whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis
KATZMANN J - 29 Apr 2025


Practice and Procedure
Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 414
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the Court has issued six subpoenas to produce documents to various third-parties including the respondents’ legal representatives at the appellant’s request – where the appellant has served the Second Respondent with a notice to produce – whether the subpoenas and notice to produce serve a legitimate forensic purpose
PERRAM J - 24 Apr 2025


Corporations Law
Hodgson (Liquidator), in the matter of ACN 009 068 473 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2025] FCA 410
CORPORATIONS – liquidators' application for approval to enter into litigation funding agreement – term exceeds three months – s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – potential voidable transaction proceeding – application for suppression orders to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – approval granted and suppression order made
BANKS-SMITH J - 24 Apr 2025


Migration
GRPN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 406
MIGRATION - judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal as to whether to revoke cancellation of visa - whether Tribunal misunderstood nature of applicant's claims - whether Tribunal considered the best interests of minor children in Australia to in the appropriate manner - whether Tribunal considered the impact of removal on immediate family members in Australia - jurisdictional error found - application upheld
JACKSON J - 28 Apr 2025


Costs
SunshineLoans Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) [2025] FCAFC 60
COSTS - indemnity costs sought by respondent - where appellant's appeal substantively unsuccessful - where respondent alleged unreasonable conduct by appellant in bringing the appeal, formulating appeal grounds and failing to engage with findings of primary judge - whether full indemnity as to costs justified in the circumstances - held appellant's conduct unreasonable in two substantial but not all respects - appellant ordered to pay percentage (90%) of respondent's costs as assessed on an indemnity basis
PERRAM, BROMWICH AND COLVIN JJ - 24 Apr 2025


Migration
TGRN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 405
MIGRATION – application for extension of time for filing of application for judicial review – error in Tribunal’s decision conceded – no appearance by the applicant – application dismissed for non-appearance
DOWLING J - 10 Apr 2025


Corporations Law
Keenan, in the matter of Prospero Markets Pty Ltd (In liq) [2025] FCA 390
CORPORATIONS – application for directions under s 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) – application for judicial advice under s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) – whether liquidators should use company’s general funds or client money held on trust to pay liquidators’ remuneration and costs – whether liquidators justified in pooling client money from company’s four bank accounts – whether liquidators justified in converting USD denominated client funds into AUD – whether liquidators justified in treating clients who traded on an offshore platform as having nil entitlement – whether liquidators justified in treating clients with entitlements of $100 or less as having nil entitlement – approval of distribution process
MOORE J - 24 Apr 2025


Migration
PLCP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 398
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to revoke cancellation of visa – whether legally unreasonable to defer assessment of non-refoulement obligations to subsequent protection visa application – whether failure to consider applicant’s representations regarding impediments to her removal to South Sudan – application dismissed
HORAN J - 24 Apr 2025


Practice and Procedure
Health Services Union v Asmar (No 4) [2025] FCA 403
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to amend concise statement and originating application – nature and purpose of concise statement – whether events occurring after proceedings filed are relevant to question under s 323 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act – where amendments refer to affidavit material previously filed – leave to amend granted
DOWLING J - 22 Apr 2025


Patents
Sanofi v Amgen Inc. (No 3) [2025] FCA 387
PATENTS – appeal from decision of Delegate of Commissioner of Patents holding oppositions to patent applications unsuccessful – applications for patents including claims to isolated monoclonal antibodies that bind to epitopes on PCSK9 that include one or more specified amino acid residues and which block binding of PCSK9 to LDLR and claims to isolated monoclonal antibodies that bind to at least one specified amino acid on PCSK9 and which block binding of PCSK9 to LDLR – where opposition based on (inter alia) alleged failure to meet requirements of s 40 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) in the form it took before amendment by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 (Cth) – whether claims would be clearly invalid if Applications proceeded to grant – whether claims fairly based on the matter described in the specifications – whether claims fail to define the invention – whether claims fail to describe the invention fully –whether claims to a single invention comprising a class of antibodies or a multiplicity of different inventions not fully described – whether claims for a manner of manufacture – whether claims entitled to priority date of 23 August 2007 based on provisional application filed on that date – whether claims involve an inventive step – whether notional skilled team would have been directly led to try to generate antibodies in the expectation that they may well block binding between PCSK9 and LDLR – consideration of state of the art at the priority date PATENTS – whether claims to isolated monoclonal antibodies that compete with specified reference antibodies for binding to PCSK9 lack clarity by failing to specify a numerical value or otherwise failing to provide a workable standard with respect to such competition Held: Appeal dismissed
NICHOLAS J - 23 Apr 2025


Was this page useful?

What did you like about it?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

How can we make it better?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

* This online submission is protected by captcha