More

The Employment and Industrial Relations National Practice Area (NPA) covers matters that are substantially of a character of employment and/or industrial relations, including:

• matters involving the exercise of jurisdiction under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act), the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) (Registered Organisations Act) and the Fair Work (Building Industry) Act 2012 (Cth)
• matters arising under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) relevant to boycotts, the conduct of employee organisations, and prohibited arrangements for goods and services or misleading conduct, where the issues relate to:
  • the conduct of any employer or employee; or
  • the conduct of any association of employers or employees or their officers or members in that capacity, such as may arise under ss 45D, 45DA, 45DC, 45DD, 45E, 45EA and 45EB, and s 31 of Schedule 2, of that Act
• matters arising under any anti-discrimination legislation or regulation of the Commonwealth or a State, where the issues relate to:
  • the conduct of any employer or employee; or
  • the conduct of any association of employers or employees or their officers or members
• matters arising under the Public Service Act 1999 (Cth)
• matters arising under the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth)
• matters arising under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), including appeals under s 172 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth)
• matters within the Court’s jurisdiction under s 273A of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), whether or not the matter is brought in the Fair Work Division of the Court
• employment-related matters involving an administrative decision by a person holding office under a Commonwealth Act
• matters in which mandamus, prohibition or similar relief is claimed against the Fair Work Commission
• matters remitted from the High Court of Australia in which the relief sought relates to an act or omission of the Fair Work Commission
• employment-related matters involving appeals or referrals from the Administrative Review Tribunal
• matters arising under a contract of employment or involving rights, entitlements or obligations of any employer or employee as such any other proceeding the character of which is substantially one of employment or industrial relations.

For a number of the matters listed above, the Federal Court is not the only court, and may not be the most appropriate court, in which to commence a proceeding. Section 539 of the Fair Work Act (contravention of civil remedy) is an example of a provision which identifies the courts in which proceedings may be commenced. In some cases, it may be necessary first to obtain the certificate of the Fair Work Commission: see, e.g. ss 370 and 778 of the Fair Work Act (unlawful termination applications). Intending applicants should give careful attention to these issues and requirements.

For further information, see also:

• Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
• Fair Work Commission

The practice note for this NPA sets out the arrangements for the management of employment and industrial relations proceedings:

Other practice notes which may be relevant to this NPA include:

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.

Division 34.1 of the Federal Court Rules - Fair work proceedings

Parties to a proceeding that the Fair Work Act or the Registered Organisations Act applies must comply with Division 34.1 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (Rules) (see r 34.02).

The Court may in its discretion make orders dispensing with the requirements of the Rules or make any order that is inconsistent with the Rules.

Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA - see r 8.02 of the Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Commencing a proceeding

Every proceeding in the Federal Court must be commenced in a Division - either the General Division or the Fair Work Division of the Court. Many of the proceedings in this NPA will be required to be commenced in the Fair Work Division, including proceedings under the Fair Work Act, the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act and the Fair Work (Building Industry) Act. In other situations, intending applicants should refer to the terms of the legislation under which the proceeding is brought. In the absence of a statutory requirement for a proceeding to be commenced in the Fair Work Division, it must be commenced in the General Division.

The types of cases within this NPA may fall within the following categories:

1. Civil matters
2. An application made to the Federal Court under one of its other heads of jurisdiction (writ of mandamus, prohibition or injunction; or declaration or injunction)
3. An appeal from the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)
4. An appeal from the Federal Circuit and Family Court to the Federal Court
5. Criminal matters.

The tables below set out various types of matters in this NPA and the forms to be completed and the associated rules. The tables are not exhaustive.

Before commencing a proceeding you must ensure you have complied with the relevant legislation and the Rules, including Division 34.1.

1.  Civil matters

2.  An application made to the Federal Court under one of its other heads of jurisdiction

An application may also be commenced in the Federal Court for a range of remedies, such as for a writ of mandamus, prohibition or injunction; a declaration; or another type of injunctive relief.

3.  An appeal from the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)

4.  An appeal from the Federal Circuit and Family Court to the Federal Court

5.  Criminal matters

For further procedural and case management information you should refer to the Central Practice Note and the Employment and Industrial Relations Practice Note.

All Forms

• Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth)
• Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
• Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth)
• Fair Work (Building Industry) Act 2012 (Cth)
• Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)
• Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
• Public Service Act 1999 (Cth)
• Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth)
• Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
• Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth)
• Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth)
• Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)

• 29 Apr 2025: Central Goldfields Shire Council v Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union [2025] FCAFC 59
  INDUSTRIAL LAW – application for judicial review of a decision of a Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (“Commission”) – where Commission made a single interest employer authorisation (“SIEA”) – whether Commission misunderstood how properly to assess whether or not the making of an SIEA would be contrary to the public interest – whether…
  Judge: COLLIER, SNADEN AND RAPER JJ
• 29 Apr 2025: Mount v Dover Castle Metals Pty Ltd (Costs) [2025] FCA 402
  COSTS – where applicant sued respondents for damages/compensation, exemplary damages and pecuniary penalties alleging contraventions of whistleblower provisions of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and of general protections provisions of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and also claimed to have been wrongfully dismissed – where Fair Work Act claims abandoned…
  Judge: KATZMANN J
• 22 Apr 2025: Health Services Union v Asmar (No 4) [2025] FCA 403
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to amend concise statement and originating application – nature and purpose of concise statement – whether events occurring after proceedings filed are relevant to question under s 323 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act – where amendments refer to affidavit material previously filed – leave to amend…
  Judge: DOWLING J
• 16 Apr 2025: Burt v University of Sydney [2025] FCA 393
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal interlocutory judgment dismissing application to strike out a strike out application – whether decision attended by sufficient doubt to warrant its reconsideration by Full Court – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused supposing decision to be…
  Judge: OWENS J
• 3 Apr 2025: Communications Electrical Electronic Energy Information Postal Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Simpec Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 370
  Judge: COLVIN J
• 16 Apr 2025: Lim v Flinders University of South Australia (No 4) [2025] FCA 377
  Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
• 16 Apr 2025: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Kent Projects Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 362
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out allegations of fraud in the applicant’s statement of claim – where applicant alleges non-disclosure of information by respondent amounted to fraud on the Fair Work Commission – where respondent claims the facts pleaded do not establish any cause of action – whether necessary to allege information…
  Judge: RANGIAH J
• 14 Apr 2025: Cacciola v Serco Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 361
  EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS - appeal from decision of Industrial Magistrates Court of Western Australia - alleged contraventions of enterprise agreement by underpayment - alleged contraventions of s 50 and s 323(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - interpretation of enterprise agreement - application for extension of time allowed - appeal…
  Judge: VANDONGEN J
• 11 Apr 2025: Lal v Royal Australasian College of Physicians [2025] FCA 348
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applications for summary judgment pursuant to s 31A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 26.01 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where applicant in substantive proceedings a doctor trained in India – where applicant in substantive proceedings claimed various relief related to accreditation as Overseas Trained…
  Judge: COLLIER J
• 10 Apr 2025: Rindeklev v Commonwealth of Australia (Recusal Request) [2025] FCA 354
  PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - recusal request by applicant - claims of apprehended bias by judge - whether a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the question the judge is required to decide - where disqualification of a judge for apprehended bias requires more than an …
  Judge: COLVIN J

• Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
• Fair Work Commission
• Fair Work Ombudsman
• Administrative Review Tribunal