Today

Today's published judgments

Migration
Miller v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 494
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of migration decision – leave granted for amendment of originating application – whether Tribunal failed to consider protection of Australian community and/or ongoing risk – whether Tribunal erred in failing to comply with Ministerial Direction 99 – ground rejected on current authorities as they stand – whether Tribunal erred in assessing strength, nature and duration of ties to Australian community – amended originating application for review of migration decision dismissed.
5 May 2025 |  JACKMAN J


Bankruptcy
Scenic Rim Regional Council v Cutbush [2025] FCA 493
BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY — Application under s 52(5) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to extend the period at the expiration of which the creditor’s petition will lapse — Intervention of the Official Receiver as amicus curie — procedural delays not attributable to the Applicant — Orders granted.
15 May 2025 |  WHEATLEY J


Corporations Law
Caddy (Administrators Appointed), in the matter of Roberts Co (Vic) Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2025] FCA 492
BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY — Application by administrators for directions under s 90-15 of Div 90 of Sch 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — Whether appropriate to give direction — Application for direction granted.
12 May 2025 |  WHEATLEY J


Corporations Law
MedAdvisor Limited, in the matter of MedAdvisor Limited [2025] FCA 491
CORPORATIONS — Share issues in ASX listed company — Failure to give notice under s 708A(5)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — Requirement to make disclosure concerning share issues under s 706 in absence of cleansing notice — Effect on on-sales — Extension of period under s 708A(6)(a) to date cleansing notice issued — Application for relief by way of extensions and declarations under ss 1322(4)(a) and (d) — Potential of on-sellers’ failure to comply with ss 707(3) or 727(1) — Relief from civil liability — Other orders sought under ss 1322(4)(c) and 1322(4)— Orders made.
2 May 2025 |  WHEATLEY J


Costs
Mond v The Age Company Pty Limited (pre-judgment interest) [2025] FCA 495
COSTS – pre-judgment interest – whether pre-judgment interest should be calculated at rate provided for in Practice Note on Interest on Judgments – GPN-INT – s 51A(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – interest on damages for non-economic loss – appropriate rate of interest is not “commercial rate” – applicant’s harm continuing but greater at time of defamatory publications – appropriate rate between 3% and 3.5%
15 May 2025 |  WHEELAHAN J


Native Title
Yanunijarra Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC v State of Western Australia [2025] FCA 490
NATIVE TITLE – right to negotiate – expedited procedure – proposed grant of exploration licences under Mining Act 1978 (WA) – where State of Western Australia gave notice of future acts under s 29 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – where notices included statement under s 29(7) that State considered the act was an act attracting the expedited procedure – where native title parties lodged objections against inclusion of s 29(7) statement with the National Native Title Tribunal – where native title parties and representative Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander body applied for judicial review of alleged decisions by State to include expedited procedure statements in the s 29 notices – where applicants alleged that State failed to give active consideration to definition of “act attracting the expedited procedure” in s 237 of the Act – where applicants alleged that State’s policy for including expedited procedure statements in s 29 notices was inconsistent with requirements of the Act – application by State for summary judgment against applicants – whether applicants had reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the proceeding – whether proceeding was an abuse of the process of the Court – whether alleged decisions by State to include expedited procedure statements in s 29 notices are reviewable decisions under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) or are otherwise amenable to judicial review Held: alleged decisions are not reviewable – summary judgment application allowed
15 May 2025 |  HORAN J


Practice and Procedure
Spozac Pty Ltd as trustee for the LDB Family Trust t/as Not Just Cakes v Tyro Payments Ltd (No 3) [2025] FCA 488
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding – group member settlement scheme previously approved by Court – interlocutory application by administrator of settlement scheme – application seeking increase in amount of costs permitted to be paid in respect of administration of the scheme – failure to disclose that approval of the scheme had been sought and obtained on the basis of a promise not to seek recovery of costs in excess of a cap – scheme administrator threatening to resign – no justification whatsoever for departing from the basis upon which the scheme was approved – application refused – order made prohibiting the administrator from resigning without leave of the Court
9 May 2025 |  OWENS J


Industrial Law
Orica Australia Pty Ltd v Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation [2025] FCAFC 65
INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal from judgment of single judge – where court determined that appellant’s employees who performed shotfiring or related services at black coal mines were “eligible employee[s]” pursuant to Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Administration Act 1992 (Cth) (“Administration Act”) – where statutory definition called up definition contained in award – where appellant divested itself in February 2022 of a separate business that provided services to underground black coal mines – whether primary judge erred by failing to apply cl 4.3(g) of Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2010 (“BCMI Award”) when construing statutory definition – whether primary judge erred by concluding that “otherwise” in cl 4.3(g) of BCMI Award should be read as “in any event” – whether primary judge erred by granting declaratory relief that extended beyond point of divestment – whether primary judge erred in determining that appellant was otherwise engaged in black coal mining industry for purposes of cl 4.3(g) of BCMI Award – appeal allowed in part.
15 May 2025 |  COLLIER, SNADEN AND HATCHER JJ


Corporations Law
Vasudevn, in the matter of Harbour Guidance Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2025] FCA 486
CORPORATIONS — Application under s 439A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to extend the period in which the First Plaintiffs (administrators) must convene the second meeting of the creditors of the administered company under s 439A(1) — Orders granted.
1 May 2025 |  WHEATLEY J


Industrial Law
Communications Electrical Electronic Energy Information Postal Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Simpec Pty Ltd (Liability) [2025] FCA 470
INDUSTRIAL LAW - application for declaratory relief, compensation and interest in respect of annual leave and personal leave entitlements of workers employed in the Iron Bridge Project - where enterprise agreement allowed for system of works with unpaid authorised leave - where workers employed for a 21 days on-swing and 7 days off-swing roster - consideration of the manner in which annual leave and personal leave accrues having regard to terms of enterprise agreement and national employment standards within the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - whether allowing accrued leave as well as overtime entitlements would amount to unjust enrichment for workers such that compensation would not be appropriate unless adjusted - whether claim could be brought on behalf of a class of workers or only an identified worker - whether a referee should be appointed to calculate appropriate compensation for workers - application dismissed
14 May 2025 |  COLVIN J


Was this page useful?

What did you like about it?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

How can we make it better?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

* This online submission is protected by captcha