Federal Court of Australia

Search: website | cases | judgments | library catalogues

h
h

 Home arrow Information for practitioners arrow Admiralty and maritime matters

Recent case law

spacer arrow Commonwealth of Australia
spacer arrow Australian states and territories
spacer arrow United Kingdom
spacer arrow New Zealand
spacer arrow Singapore
spacer arrow Hong Kong
spacer arrow Canada
spacer arrow United States
spacer arrow South Africa

Commonwealth of Australia

arrow 18 April 2008: Balaji Cranes Ltd v Lampson (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 882

arrow 6 March 2008: Lampson (Australia) Pty Ltd v Australian Crane & Machinery Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 400
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – s 31A(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – test to be applied – whether reasonable prospect of successful defence
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – award of interest under s 51A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – adopt rates of interest applied by Supreme Court of State or Territory in which Court is sitting
CONTRACTS – contracting parties – general principlescontracting parties to be identified by consideration of objective intention of parties

arrow 14 December 2007: Hilditch Pty Ltd v Dorval Kaiun KK (No 2) [2007] FCA 2014
SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – carriage of goods by sea – bill of lading – endorsement in blank – effect of – whether bill became a bearer bill by being endorsed in blank – whether delivery of bill of lading endorsed in blank was sufficient to vest property in cargo in the bearer of the bill – where endorsed bill was one of a set of three – whether necessary separately to endorse all three original bills of lading for the bearer to be able to claim delivery of the goods
SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – carriage of goods by sea – contamination of cargo – point at which contamination occurred – whether carrier complied with its obligations to properly and carefully discharge the cargo under Art 3 r 2 of the amended Hague Rules
SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – discharge of cargo – where cargo in good condition in ship’s tanks but later discharging at the ship’s manifold in a contaminated condition – where portion of cargo slopped at the direction of the owner of the goods – where cargo remained visibly contaminated at the conclusion of slopping – where owner of the goods permitted discharge to continue – whether owner of the goods was responsible for any part of its claimed loss in these circumstances – whether conduct of the owner of the goods constituted an act or omission under Art 4 r 2(i) of the amended Hague Rules – concurrent causes of a loss
SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – contamination of cargo – whether notice of loss or damage of cargo given in writing to the carrier 'at the time of' discharge for the purposes of Art 3 r 6 of the amended Hague Rules  
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interest under s 51A of the Federal Court of Australia Act (1976) – method of calculating pre-judgment interest

arrow 11 December 2007: Mitsubishi Australia Limited v Ship MV Patriot [2007] FCA 1982

arrow 3 October 2007: Heilbrunn v Lightwood PLC [2007] FCA 1518
ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME JURISDICTION – meaning of “a claim arising out of an agreement that relates to carriage of goods by a ship” for s 4(3)(f) of the Admiralty Act 1988 – whether damage to goods caused by a warehouseman acting under an agreement with a freight forwarder who undertook to carry the goods by land and sea, loading a shipping container at its premises prior to transportation to the port for loading on board ship fell within the provision – whether the proceeding should be dismissed or stayed because of a time bar or exclusive jurisdiction clause

Australian states and territories

arrow 26 July 2007: Puccini Festival Australia Pty Ltd v Nippon Express (Australia) Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 288 (26 July 2007)
BILLS OF LADING – carriage of goods by sea – contractual negotiations conducted by email – whether plaintiff was party to the contract of carriage.

arrow 6 July 2007: Pan Orient Shipping Services Pty Ltd v Basell Australia Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 215
SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – multimodal carriage of goods – where freight forwarder engaged to arrange multimodal transport – whether contract with freight forwarder was fixed price or full indemnity contract.

 

United Kingdom
arrow 7 December 2007: Cereal Investments Company SA v ED&F Man Sugar Ltd [2007] EWHC 2843 (Comm)
BILLS OF LADING – where letter of credit require presentation of bill by certain date – where seller required option that bill be dated after that date – whether seller’s conduct amounted to repudiation of contract of sale.

arrow 9 November 2007: Air and General Finance Limited v RYB Marine Limited [2007] CSOH 177
ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME – sale of vessel under finance – where vessel purportedly sold to subsequent party – where registered mortgagee sought to enforce rights of sale upon default of original purchaser – where subsequent purchaser’s claim for breach of warranty as to title not yet determined – whether subsequent purchaser’s claim for breach of warranty could amount to a special lien over the vessel – whether mortgagee’s power to sell affected by subsequent purchaser’s claimed lien.

arrow 31 October 2007: Waterfront Shipping Company Limited v Trafigura AG [2007] EWHC 2482 (Comm)
CHARTERPARTIES – Beepevoy 3 form - practice and procedure – claim for demurrage – application for summary judgment dismissing claim on grounds that claim time-barred by terms of contract.

arrow 23 October 2007: Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship and Barge ‘Kamal XXVI’ v Owners of the Ship ‘Ariela’ [2007] EWHC 2434
COLLISION – apportionment of blame – whether unlit barge a contributing factor.

arrow 17 October 2007: Premium Nafta Products Limited v Fili Shipping Company Limited [2007] UKHL 40
CHARTERPARTIES – Shelltime 4 form – where charters allegedly obtained by bribery – where owners purported to rescind charterparties – whether validity of attempt to rescind to be determined by arbitration or by a court.

arrow 17 October 2007: Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari [2007] EWCA Civ 998
ARBITRATION – whether arbitral tribunal failed to act fairly – whether appellant had reasonable opportunity to present case at arbitration.

arrow 11 October 2007: Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd v Holystone Overseas Ltd [2007] EWHC 2319 (Comm)
ARBITRATION – application to vary freezing order – whether correct test had been applied to ascertain value of assets to be covered by freezing order – application to increase security on cross-claim

 

New Zealand

(No recent cases)

 

Singapore

31 July 2007: The “Vasiliy Golovnin” [2007] SGHC 116
Admiralty – action in rem – charter party – amended New York Produce Exchange (NYPE) terms – port of discharge named in three of the four bills of lading – change of discharge port – damage to cargo – setting aside of warrant of arrest of chartered vessel – failure to disclose material facts – issue estoppel – refusal to order damages for wrongful arrest of sister ship High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 123, 1985 Rev Ed), s 3(1)(g)and (h).

27 July 2007: PT Soonlee Metalindo Perkasa v Synergy Shipping Pte Ltd (Freighter Services Pte Ltd, Third Party) [2007] SGHC 121
CARRIAGE OF GOODS – loss of cargo – action for breach of contract – incorporation of limitation clauses – claim against third party for indemnity based on contract for supply of barge – unseaworthiness of vessel.

 

Hong Kong

 13 July 2007: Carewins Envelopment (China) Limited v Bright Fortune Shipping Ltd
BILLS OF LADING – application of “presentation rule” to straight bills of lading – whether terms of bill exempted carriers from liability for delivery of goods without presentation of bill of lading.

 

Canada

21 December 2007: Laichkwiltach Enterprises Ltd v The Ship “Pacific Faith” [2007] BCSC 1852
ADMIRALTY – collision – whether defendant negligent.
DAMAGES – economic loss - whether plaintiff entitled to recover lost wages for captain and crew from defendant as result of collision.

4 December 2007: Kremikovtzki Trade v Phoenix Bulk Carriers Ltd [2007] FCA 381
ADMIRALTY – cargo of coal arrested – whether arrested cargo was subject of the action – whether the charterer was beneficial owner of the cargo.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether affidavit of Lead Warrant to arrest cargo complied with Rule 481(2) of Federal Court Rules.

14 September 2007: Mazda Canada Inc v Mitsui OSK Lines Co Ltd [2007] FC 916
SHIPPING – salvage – whether cargo interest entitled to indemnity for contribution to salvage.
BILLS OF LADING – carriage of goods – where bill specified choice of law clause – reconciliation with s 46 of the Marine Liability Act – forum non conveniens.

 

United States

(No recent cases)

 

South Africa

(No recent cases)

back to top

 

Home | What's new | the Court | Information for litigants | Information for practitioners | Information for students | Filing, forms, fees and costs | Court lists and hearings | Court documents and transcript | eCourt | Judgments | Library catalogues | Legal research links | Contact the Court's registries | Translation services

Translation services

© Federal Court of Australia 1996 - 2005
Privacy | Disclaimer | Site index | Ask a question | Feedback | About this site
Updated June 23, 2008